Blog

The Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) has ruled against the banks and established that costs declared to be abusive and unduly charged to customers must be refunded, unless national law provides otherwise. Thus, with the exception of the Stamp Duty, the banks must refund the expenses derived from clauses that were declared abusive at the time.

The defendant was sentenced in the first instance to pay the late payment surcharge only from the date he acquired the property, but not for the surcharges prior to its acquisition. The Castellón Provincial Court confirmed the application of this time limit.

According to the accounting of IRPH rulings that Asufin is publishing on its website, since the European Court of Justice (TJUE) ruled on IRPH, there have been 28 court decisions in favor of those affected and only 16 that favored the interests of the banks.

The High Court of Justice of the Basque Country (TSJPV) has ruled that the Basque Health Service-Osakidetza failed to comply with the regulations on the prevention of occupational risks during the coronavirus health crisis and that the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) represented "a serious and imminent occupational risk" to the health of its workers.

The Guadalajara Provincial Court has granted joint custody to one parent, stating that it is not an obstacle to granting it that he has to spend one day away from home. The sentence was issued on March 3, 2020 (61/2020).

The Provincial Court of Las Palmas has declared the clauses relating to early maturity and the passing on of all mortgage costs to the borrower to be null and void.